The Appetite of Tyranny
G. K. Chesterton
Lu par LibriVox Volunteers
In The Appetite of Tyranny, G. K. Chesterton explores the complex interplay between individual actions and the broader societal consequences they yield. Written in the wake of early 20th-century turmoil, this collection of essays delves into the nature of tyranny and the human condition, questioning the motivations behind both personal and political decisions.
Chesterton's incisive wit and keen observations illuminate the absurdities of modern life, as he reflects on the moral implications of our choices. He argues that the chaos of the world often stems from a collective madness, where personal failings contribute to larger societal issues. Through his thought-provoking prose, he invites readers to consider the deeper narratives that shape our reality.
This work stands out for its blend of philosophical inquiry and social commentary, making it a significant contribution to the discourse on freedom and responsibility. Chesterton's unique perspective encourages listeners to reflect on their own roles within the fabric of society, making it a timeless examination of the human experience.
Chapitres
Select a chapter to play
| The Facts of the Case | 13:56 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| The War on the Word | 17:02 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| The Refusal of Reciprocity | 19:23 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| The Appetite of Tyranny | 17:02 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| The Escape of Folly | 13:49 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| Letters to an Old Garibaldian - Letter 1 | 16:11 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| Letters to an Old Garibaldian - Letter 2 | 16:41 | Lu par Ray Clare | |
| Letters to an Old Garibaldian - Letter 3 | 13:18 | Lu par Ray Clare |
Critiques
Root of the Nazis
Stuart Gathmam
The master race conceit was at the root of WW I, long before Hitler.
interesting look at historical sentiments.
Logan Nicholson
I appreciate Chesterton's perspective and how he can point out the absurd in global affairs. I don't think it is one of his best works, but a good read anyway. it is puzzling to a modern to see such strong argument against the "master race" while making sweeping generalizations about the temperament of various races, but also stateing that all people are that same. I wonder if perhaps back then the common term of race or nationality may have included that country's beliefs like we use the term culture. so we might say the German culture disposed them to be robotic. instead of the Prussian race is stiff and inflexible.