Darwin 200: Dawkins and Harries

56:26

Read by Richard Dawkins, Richard Harries and Jeremy Paxman

Good discussion.

Toboldlygo.

(3 Sterne)

Off core topic too much in defence of religion. Darwin simply submitted his findings in a scientific manor, not intending facts to be twisted in order to fit the fiction of creationists. I believe he should be regarded as life's forensic investigator.

entertaining debate

null

(3 Sterne)

Entertaining with intelligent and respectfully conversing participants but not much new if you have been listening to the atheism vs theism debate in general. I wish they had talked a tad more about the main topic, Darwin, instead of deviating into side topics.

The sound unfortunately was not good. I couldn't hear the debate as voices were not close enough to be picked up.

John Thormeyer

(2,5 Sterne)